by Paul Semendinger
***
As we wait for the season to begin, I thought it might be fun to look back at some of the old Topps baseball card sets and rank the designs.
Here are the 1980s designs year-by-year:
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
Some thoughts:
1990 - I'm not a big fan of this design. It looks cheap. To me it is one of the worst Topps set designs ever.
1991 - I really like this set. It's one of my favorites, clean crisp, nice.
1992 - Also a nice set, but as they tried to imitate 1991, it came up a little short.
1993 - A nice clean set, but it's lacking somehow.
1994 - A bad design
1995 - A worse design, some player names are difficult to read. The script is ugly.
1996 - A great design, BUT, the player names are still difficult to read.
1997 - I love this design. A home run. The best of the decade. The gold is sharp. I love the players' name fonts on the bottom of the card.
1998 - Like 1992, they tried to replicate the previous year, but fell a little short.
1999 - Almost as good as 1997, crisp, clean, clear, gold... very nice.
***
MY RANKINGS:
1997
1996
1999
1991
1992
1998
1993
1994
1995
1990
How do you rank these designs?
google seo google seo技术飞机TG-cheng716051;
03topgame 03topgame
gamesimes gamesimes;
Fortune Tiger Fortune Tiger;
Fortune Tiger Slots Fortune Tiger…
Fortune Tiger Fortune Tiger;
EPS машины EPS машины;
Fortune Tiger Fortune Tiger;
EPS Machine EPS Cutting Machine;
EPS Machine EPS and EPP…
EPP Machine EPP Shape Moulding…
EPS Machine EPS and EPP…
EPTU Machine ETPU Moulding Machine
EPS Machine EPS Cutting Machine;
Not real crazy about any of these. I prefer portraits, posed or un-posed, that show the full face.
Any card without the player's position on its face is Go Directly To Fail. That's '90, '92-'93, and '96-'99. Any card where the player's name is illegible is Go Directly to Fail. That's '95 and '98. Thus, '98 is The Worst. '90, '92-'93, '95-'97, and '99 are tied for Second Worst. These cards are abomination.
That leaves '91, which is marred by the stupid "Topps 40" logo, but still ranks No. 2 in a decade of dreck. No. 1 is 1994: clean, clear, informative. I am mystified as to why Paul calls it a "bad design."